1. Writer's Ethics

Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that the submitted work is original and does not plagiarize the work of others. Any quotations or use of others' work must be accompanied by proper references.

Duplicate Publication: Authors must not submit the same or similar manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously. Duplicate publication of the same research is not permitted.

Source Acknowledgment: Authors must always provide proper acknowledgment of the works and research that influence their own work.

Authorship: Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the research. All parties who have contributed should be recognized as authors, while those who have not been significantly involved should not be included.

Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Authors must disclose any financial or substantive conflicts of interest that may affect the outcome or interpretation of their research.

Errors in Published Work: If authors discover significant errors or inaccuracies in their published work, they must promptly inform the journal editor and collaborate to retract or correct the article.

2. Ethics Editor

Publication Decision: The editor is responsible for deciding which articles will be published. This decision should be based on the validity of the work and the significance of the research to the readers.

Justice and Non-Discrimination: Editors must evaluate manuscripts without regard to the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, citizenship, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality: Editors and editorial staff must not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Editors should not use unpublished information disclosed in manuscripts submitted for their own research without the written consent of the authors.

3. Ethics Reviewer

Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Reviewers assist editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communication with authors, can also help authors improve the quality of their manuscripts.

Confidentiality: Every manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. The manuscript must not be shown or discussed with others unless permitted by the editor.

Objectivity Standard: Reviews must be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not allowed. Reviewers must clearly state their views with supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment: Reviewers must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been reported previously must be accompanied by a relevant citation. Reviewers must also inform the editor about any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and any other manuscripts they are aware of.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not review manuscripts where they have a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the paper.

4. Publisher Ethics

Fairness in Publication: Publishers must ensure that editorial decisions are truly based on the assessment of academic quality and not on commercial interests.

Editorial Independence: Publishers must support editorial independence without influence from advertisements or other revenues.

Handling Ethical Violations: The publisher, together with the editor, must take the necessary steps to address publication ethics violations, including corrections, article retractions, and notifying relevant institutions if necessary.

By adhering to these ethical standards, the journal aims to maintain scientific integrity and public trust in academic publications.